Author Archives: admin

Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy

Call for Proposals – Special Issues

JHAP recently created a position of Editor for Special Issues with the purpose of offering support for first rate thematic collections of articles and encourage collective and collaborative publications in the field. The Editor for Special Issues is tasked to receive and assess proposals and to steward prospective Guest-Editors throughout the process.

Proposals on any topic within the scope of the Journal are welcome and encouraged. JHAP aims to promote research and provide a forum for discussion of the history of analytic philosophy. ‘History’ and ‘analytic’ are understood broadly. JHAP takes the history of analytic philosophy to be part of analytic philosophy. Accordingly, it publishes historical research that interacts with the ongoing concerns of analytic philosophers and with the history of other twentieth century philosophical movements and traditions.

Open Access Policy

JHAP provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. No fees are charged to authors for submission or publication of their works.

Length of Issues

JHAP is an online open access publication that offers broad flexibility of format for collections of articles and length of contributions. There are no a priori constraints to the number of essays or the minimum/maximum number of words of each article. This is meant to encourage innovative approach to scholarship and to offer flexibility for Guest-Editors.


Those interested in acting as Guest-Editor for a special issue are asked to submit a 2-page proposal describing the theme of the issue and the proposed list of contributors. All submissions will be reviewed by the Editorial Board to assess fit. Each proposal deemed to fall within the scope of the journal will then be reviewed by external referees. Successful proposals will further receive input from the Editor for Special Issues.

To request a proposal submission form or to submit a proposal contact the Editor for Special Issues directly: The Subject must read: “JHAP Special Issue Project”.

Peer-Review of Articles

JHAP will insure that submitted proposals as well as the complete final draft of special issues be peer-reviewed. Guest-Editors will be responsible for anonymously refereeing individual articles within their special issue.


Guest-Editors will be responsible for delivering their special issue within the time-frame they will have defined, on a case by case basis, in consultation with the Editor for Special Issue. Failure to deliver an issue within the time-frame might result in a cancellation of the project

Support for Guest-Editors

Guest-Editors for special issues will have access to a user-friendly portal that will allow them to manage their project online. They will also be stewarded through the project by the Editor for Special Issues. The position of Editor for Special Issues was created with the objective of encouraging new project and fostering a better culture around intellectual collaborations. Those are the principles that will be applied in all aspects of the process.

Commissioned Projects

The Editor for Special Issue is also tasked to recruit Guest-Editors for new projects. Recruitment is guided by the principles that are at the core of JHAP’s mandate: to encourage and support historical research that interacts with the ongoing concerns of analytic philosophy and with the history of other twentieth century philosophical traditions, and to do so in ways that challenges received views and promotes innovation.

Historiography, Methodology, Metaphilosophy and the Canon

28-30 June 2018, McMaster University
Organisers: Sandra Lapointe and Erich Reck

This workshop is a true workshop. It brings together leading scholars working in the history and historiography of philosophy to exchange views and share constructive proposals on a number of concerted questions. Each invited speakers at the workshop will lead a 90 minutes discussions focused around a topic of their choice. They will be invited to give a short presentation and make material available, but the program does not include formal talks and each session will be dedicated to evaluating specific problems and questions in a collaborative spirit.

Invited Speakers: Mike Beaney (King’s College London / Humboldt-Universität Berlin), Margaret Cameron (University of Victoria, BC), Catarina Dutilh (University of Groningen), Chris Green (Dept. Psychology, York University), Daniel Harris, (Hunter College, CUNY),  Martin Kusch (Universität Vienna), Sandra Lapointe (McMaster University), Chris Meyns (Utrecht University), Claude Panaccio (Université du Québec à Montréal), Lydia Patton (Virginia Tech), Erich Reck (UC Riverside), Daniel Woolf (Queen’s University)

Provisional Schedule:

  28 June 29 June 30 June
9:30 – 11:00 Mike Beaney, Kings College London and Humboldt Universität

Developments and Debates in the Historiography of Philosophy after 1945

Catarina Dutilh, University of Groningen

Conceptual genealogy and longue durée history of philosophy

Martin Kusch, University of Vienna

Relativism and the Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge

11:30-13:00 Christopher Green, York University

Scholarly Institutions as the Fulcrums in the History of Psychology and Philosophy

Chris Meyns, University of Utrecht

Philosophy Without Journals

Erich Reck, University of California Irvine

Philosophical Histories and Goals: The Case of the Analytic Tradition

14:00-15:30 Lydia Patton, Viginia Tech

The Canon as Normal Science? Prospects for a Kuhnian Analysis of Philosophical Research

Daniel Woolf, Queen’s University


Margaret Cameron, University of Victoria

Challenging the canon and the epistemology behind it

16:00-17:30 Claude Panaccio, UQÀM

Historical Narratives and Transtemporal Problems in Philosophy

Daniel Harris, Hunter College/CUNY

How Soon is Too Soon? 


Sandra Lapointe, McMaster University

The Metaphysics of Disciplinary History


Logic from Kant to Russell – Work Session with Sandra Lapointe, Nick Stang and Clinton Tolley

17 February 2018, 10:00-13:00

The work session will be dedicated to discussing three papers to be included in the forthcoming Logic from Kant to Russell (Sandra Lapointe, ed.; London, Routledge):

  • Sandra Lapointe, McMaster: How Logic Changes (And How Historians Write About It)
  • Nick Stang, University of Toronto: Frege and Lotze: Logical Anti-Psychologism in Context
  • Clinton Tolley, UC San Diego: Hegel’s Conception of Thinking in his Logics

If you are interested in attending, please contact: lapointe@mcmaster

Location TBA.


2018 Annual Meetings of SSHAP and BRS

Next June, McMaster will be hosting the annual meetings of the Society for the Study of the History of Analytical Philosophy (19-21) and the Bertrand Russell Society (22-24) as part of the celebrations around the 50th Anniversary of the Russell Archives. The new home of the Archives and of the Bertrand Russell Research Centre, a swank pad at the very gate of campus, will be open for the occasion. Come and join us!

Work Session With Aviezer Tucker (Harvard): Historicism from an Epistemic Perspective

Tues. January 23rd, 2018

10:00 am – 12:00 pm

McMaster University

University Hall 316

Work Session with Aviezier Tucker (Harvard University) on themes connected to Historiography, Epistemology, and the History of Philosophy. Dr Tucker has published broadly on philosophy of historiography and history, political philosophy and theory, intellectual history and history of ideas. Including:

Students and faculty with an expertise and/or interest in historiography, history of philosophy, historical epistemology, and the intersections of history with social sciences and the study of knowledge are invited to join us for a collaborative discussion of Dr. Tucker’s forthcoming research paper “Out of Bounds: Historicism from an Epistemic Perspective”. Please contact Sean Dudley ( no later than January 10th, 2018 so we can plan refreshments and send you a draft version of Dr Tucker’s paper before the event.

All inquiries should be directed to



SSHAP and BRS to Celebrate the 50th Anniversary of the Acquisition of the Russell Archive at McMaster

McMaster will be celebrating the acquisition of the Bertrand Russell Archive in 2018 and, as part of the celebrations, the Philosophy Department will be hosting the combined meetings of the Society for the Study of the History of Analytical Philosophy ( and the Bertrand Russell Society ( Mark your calendars, for SSHAP (19-21 June 2018) and BRS (22-24 June 2018). We’ll be looking forward to welcoming you in Hamilton.

Philosophy of Mind in the 19th Century

Philosophy of Mind in the 19th Century

Meeting of the Canadian Philosophical Association

30 May 2016, 9:00-12:30

University of Calgary


The Symposium aims at documenting the fabulous richness that characterizes the study of mind over the period that extends from the publication of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) to that of Husserl’s Ideas (1913). Contributions are highlights from the eponymous project* that has three main purposes: (1) to sketch a theoretical landscape that reflects the methodological and theoretical pluralism that is characteristic of this period; (2) to draw attention to the common historical origins of psychology and philosophy of mind including cognitive sciences as we know them today; (3) to do justice to the theories of lesser known figures or of philosophers whose contribution to the study of mind has otherwise been neglected.


Philosophy of Mind in the 19th Century: Methodological Considerations. Sandra Lapointe, McMaster University

Idealist perspectives on mental activity and content. Clinton Tolley, University of California, San Diego

Mach’s contributions to philosophy of mind. Erik Banks, Wright State University

Helmholtz on the Stability and Plasticity of Phenomenal ExperienceLydia Patton, Virginia Tech

Nietzsche on Consciousness. Mattia Ricardi, University of Porto

William James on Conceptions and Private LanguageHenry Jackman, York University


*Philosophy Of Mind In The Nineteenth Century, Sandra Lapointe (ed.) – Volume 5 in The History Of The Philosophy Of Mind series edited by Rebecca Copenhaver and Christopher Shields (Routledge, forthcoming)

Table of Content

00 Introduction by Sandra Lapointe, McMaster University

 01 Bernard Bolzano on Mind and Action by Sandra Lapointe, McMaster University

02 Idealist perspectives on mental activity and content by Clinton Tolley, University of California, San Diego

03 From metaphysics to psychophysics: Herbart and the sovereign realm of presentations by Wolfgang Huemer, University of Parma and Christoph Landerer, independent scholar

04 Hermann von Helmholtz’s Theories of Sound and Color by Lydia Patton, Virginia Tech

05 Mach’s Philosophy of Mind: Sensations and Neutral Monism by Eric Banks, Wright State University

06 Nietzsche’s philosophical psychology by Mattia Riccardi, University of Porto

07 Conceptual pessimism and James’s Philosophy of Mind by Henry Jackman, York University

08 Freud’s Neurology: Surpassing 19th Century Philosophy of Mind by Bettina Bergo, University of Montreal

09 Brentano’s Philosophy of Mind  by Robin Rollinger, Czech Academy of Science

10 Mind in Meinong  by Peter Simons, Trinity College, Dublin

11 Stumpf on Joint Presentation by Mark Textor, King’s College London

12 Christian von Ehrenfels on the Mind and its Metaphysics by Carlo Ierna, Utrecht University

13 Husserl: From Intentionality to Transcendental Phenomenology  by Paul Livingston, University of New Mexico

14 Natorp’s Philosophy of Mind by Alan Kim, Stony Brook University




Logic in Kant’s Wake – SCHEDULE

McMaster University, 6-9 May 2016 (UH 316)

Sponsored by

McMaster’s Bertrand Russell Research Centre (Faculty of Humanities), Michael Forster Humboldt Professorship (Bonn, Germany), The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

PDF schedule PDF

6 May 7 May 8 May 9 May


Frederick Beiser, Syracuse

Cohen’s Logik der reinen Erkenntnis


Corey Dyck, Western

Logic and Psychology from Wolff to Kant


Consuelo Preti, The College of New Jersey

How Russell Could Have Thought Moore Was A Logician

10:30-10:45 Pause


Scott Edgar, St Mary’s

The origins of Hermann Cohen’s logic of pure knowledge

Clinton Tolley, UCSD

Hegel’s Conception of Thinking in his Logics


Nick Griffin, McMaster

Russell and Hilbert and Kant and Geometry


12:15-13:30 Catered Lunch (Wilson Library)


Gary Ostertag, CUNY

Bradley and Russell on Relations and Propositional Unity

Erich Reck , UC Riverside

The Logic in Dedekind’s Logicism


Lydia Patton, Virginia Tech

Laws of Thought and Laws of Logic: from Psychology to Mathematics after Kant

15:00-15:15 Student Session:

Laura Davis, Pittsburgh

Rethinking Logical Hylomorphism: Kant and the Subjective Formalists


Milan Soutor, Prague

Moore vs. Kant and Bradley: Are concepts acquired by operations of mind?


Joshua Eisenberg, Pittsburgh

Hertz’s Logically-Oriented Physics



Sandra Lapointe, McMaster

Methodological Pluralism and the History of Logic before and after Kant

Michael Forster, Bonn




Sean Morris, Metropolitan State University, Denver


By Skype


16:45-17:00 Pause
17:00-18:30 Graham Priest, CUNY

Kant’s Excessive Tenderness for Things in the

World, and Hegel’s Dialetheism

Nick Stang, Toronto

Der Gedanke in the Context of 19th Century Logic

Jeremy Heis,

UC Irvine

by Skype

JOB: Russell Visiting Professorship

The Department of Philosophy at McMaster University is currently advertising its 2016/17 Visiting Russell Professorship. 

The Visiting Professorships, one of which will be available each year, are intended for established scholars whose research would benefit by access to the Bertrand Russell Archives. It is an excellent opportunity for Russell scholars and historians of analytical philosophy to gain physical access to the formidable wealth of material curated at McMaster. Please consult the ad here:

Workshop: The Foundations of Methodology in the History of Philosophy

16 April 2016, Trius Winery at Hillebrand

(Call for Participants follows)

One of the biggest challenges for historians of philosophy, whether it be historians of e.g. analytic, German, modern, medieval or ancient philosophy is to make clear the various ways in which historical work can be relevant to contemporary discussion. Few philosophical resources exist that deal with questions concerning approaches and methods, and divergences across the various subfields of interest are often quite remarkable. This is to say nothing of the gap that seems to exist between historians of philosophy and historians and philosophers of science.  

The purpose of the workshop is to come to a better understanding of our own assumptions as historians and consider whether distinct approaches and methods can come to inform each other in a way that could contribute to unifying the field – and whether this is desirable in the first place. It will gather historians and philosophers of science, historians of ancient, medieval and modern philosophy as well as historians of analytical philosophy.

The workshop will revolve around current work-in-progress by eminent historian of medieval philosophy Claude Panaccio (UQAM). The morning session will be devoted to a lecture by Panaccio, followed by an open discussion. The afternoon session will consist of a round table. A number of “ theses” taken from Panaccio’s manuscript will be examined and discussed by a panel of historians with different backgrounds and interest. They include :

  • ·      Corey Dyck, Western
  • ·      Jacquline Feke, Waterloo
  • ·      David Hunter, Ryerson
  • ·      Peter King, Toronto
  • ·      Henrik Lagerlund, Western
  • ·      Sandra Lapointe, McMaster
  • ·      Christian Leduc, Montreal
  • ·      Martin Pickave, Toronto

The round table will be followed by a general discussion. Invited discussants include: Doreen Fraser (Waterloo), Mark Johnstone (McMaster), Jenny Pelletier (Leuven), Marleen Rozemond (Toronto), Anthony Skelton (Western), Nick Stang (Toronto),  John Thorp (Western).

Excerpts from Panaccio’s new manuscript, Narratives and Reconstructions. The Foundations of Methodology in the History of Philosophy, will be made available in advance to all participants. 

Call for Participants

Registration is now open for other participants, but places are limited. If you would like to attend, please send us by email a short rationale, including a description of current academic interest as well as a brief statement explaining why the workshop is relevant to your current research. The subject line of the email should be :Method in History Workshop and it should be sent to Chandra Kavanagh at:

Deadline: 26 February 2016.

The workshop will take place at Trius Winery at Hillbrand (, one of the finest wineries of the Niagara Region. The registration fee is 230$ and includes a 4 course lunch, wine tasting and a 6 course dinner, as well as refreshments throughout the day.

If you have any questions, please contact Chandra Kavanagh:



10:00-10:30 Welcome, coffee and tea, morning snacks.

10:30-12:30 Lecture by Claude Panaccio: The Foundations of Methodology in the History of Philosophy

12:30-14:00 Lunch

4 course business lunch, set menu

 14:00-17:00 Round Table.

Discussants: Corey Dyck (Western) Jacquline Feke (Waterloo), David Hunter (Ryerson), Peter King (Toronto) Henrik Lagerlund (Western), Sandra Lapointe (McMaster), Christian Leduc (Montreal), Martin Pickave (Toronto).

 17:00-19:00 Reception/Visit

Indulge in a trio of Trius’s favourite gourmet snacks with their perfect complementary wines—including their famous sparkler, Trius Brut Rosé. After we reveal a little of the mystery behind pairing food and wine, we’ll teach you your very own magic trick: how to sabre a bottle of sparking wine!

19:00 Dinner (Five course tasting menu, coffee and tea)

The Chef will create one soup course, one starter course, fish course, main course, Cheese course or dessert course


Sponsored by:

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council


McMaster University’s Philosophy Department

Bertrand Russell Research Centre

University of Toronto’s Philosophy Department